Sensitivity and Specificity of Rapid Clinical Diagnostic Test for Bacterial Vaginosis and its Analytical Value
Keywords:
High vaginal swabs, amsel criteria, clue cellsAbstract
Objective
Amsel criteria and microbiological techniques are two conventional methods for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the etiology of bacterial vaginosis in low socioeconomic female population of Karachi by comparing Amsel criteria, a bedside technique with standard microbiological methods.
Study Design
A comparative study carried out at Essa laboratory Karachi from April 2011 to March 2012.
Material and Method
373 consecutive high vaginal swabs were taken from women aged 18 to 70 years received at Essa laboratory, Karachi. Diagnosis was made by bedside Amsel criteria and two swabs sent promptly to the microbiology laboratory for gram staining and culture.
Results
Bacterial vaginosis was determined in 373 women belonging to low socioeconomic population, history along with demographic profile of patients were taken. Overall prevalence of bacterial vaginosis calculated by microbiological method was 78% and by Amsel criteria 62%. Clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis was made if three characteristics of Amsel criteria were present. Amsel criteria had a sensitivity of 77%, specificity 91%, with a positive predictive value of 97% and a negative predictive value of 53%. By microbiologic techniques organism found
Conclusion
Amsel criteria is convenient for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis at the bedside but its sensitivity is less compared to microbiological techniques which were taken as gold standard. Our study also highlights the high colonization rate of Staphylococcus aureus in particular multidrug resistant strains among females coming from low-socio economic background.
Downloads
References
Morris MC, Rogers PA, Kinghorn GR. Is bacterial vaginosis a sexually transmitted infection? Sex Transm Infect 2001; 77:63–8.
Nugent R, Krohn M, Hillier S. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297–301.
Mayaud P, ka-Gina G, Cornelissen J, Todd J, Kaatano G, West B, et al. Validation of a WHO algorithm with risk assessment for the clinical management of vaginal discharge in Mwanza, Tanzania. Sex Transm Infect 1998; 74:S77–84.
Marrazzo JM, Antonio M, Agnew K, Hillier SL. Distribution of genital Lactobacillus strains shared by female sex partners. J Infect Dis 2009; 199:680–3.
Eschenbach, DA. History and review of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:441–5.
Hillier S, Nugent R, Eschenbach D, Krohn M, Gibbs R, Martin D, et al. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1737–42.
Sobel JD. Bacterial vaginosis. Annu Rev Med 2000; 51:349–56.
Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, Kumwenda NI, Mtimavalye LA, Yang LP, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS 1998; 12:1699–706.
Fonck K, Kidula N, Jaoko W, Estambale B, Claeys P, Ndinya-Achola J, et al. Validity of the vaginal discharge algorithm among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Transm Infect 2000; 76:33–8.
Holmes B, Willcox WR, Lapage SP. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system. J Clin Pathol 1978; 31:22–30.
Mambo NC, Carbonell HT. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in women with vaginal discharge symptoms in south province, Rawanda. Afr J Cln Exper Microbiol 2009; 10:156–63.
Verstraelen H, Verhelst R. Bacterial vaginosis: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2009; 7:1109–24.
Management of bacterial vaginosis. Drug Ther Bull 1998; 36:33–5.
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297.
Shahzadi Neelam, Irum Sohail.Rapid Clinical Diagnostic Tests for Bacterial Vaginosis and its Predictive Value. International Journal of Pathology; 2010; 8(2): 50-52
Sha BE, ZariffardÊMR, Wang QJ, Chen HY, Bremer J, Cohen MH, Spear GT.Female genital-tract HIV load correlates inversely with Lactobacillus species but positively with bacterial vaginosis and mycoplasma hominis J Infect Dis 2005;191 :25-.32
Hilliers S, Holmes KK. Bacterial Vaginosis. In: Holmes K, Sparling P, Stamm W, Piot P, Wasserheit J, Corey L, et al., editors. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing; 1999. p.563–86.
Onanuga A, Oyi A, Onaolapo J. Prevalence and susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates among healthy women in Zaria, Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol 2005; 4:1321–4.
Shabbir I, Akhtar R, Nasreen F. Bacterial Vaginosis in women with vaginal discharge. Mother and Child 1999; 37:127–32.
Armstrong-Esther C. Carriage patterns of Staphylococcus aureus in a healthy non-hospital population of adults and children. Ann Hum Biol 1976;3:221–7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Yasmeen Taj, Darakhshan Nasir, Nayyar Kahkashan, Almas Anjum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Journal of Dow University of Health Sciences are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium; provided the original work is properly cited and initial publication in this journal. 
