Comparison of Aesthetic Perception of Smile Between Dentists and General Population

Authors

  • Hasan Afaq Zaidi Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Fazal ur Rehman Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Shahbaz Ahmed Jat Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr. Ishrat-ul-Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Smile perception, perception of general population, smile esthetics, maxillary lateral incisors

Abstract

Objective: To compare aesthetic perception of smile between gernal population and dentists by varying lengths of maxillary lateral incisors.
Introduction: Patient perception and expectation of their smile plays a very important role when providing an anterior tooth restoration. The aim of conducting the study was to compare the perception of esthetic smile between general population and dentists by varying length of maxillary lateral incisors.

Design: Cross sectional study.
Materials and Methods: A photograph of a female smile from frontal view was digitally altered to produce images with varying lengths of maxillary lateral incisor. These images were arranged in descending order; from most attractive to least attractive by the participants. The participants of the study included two groups; first group comprised of Dental Surgeons where as second group consisted of general population.

Results: Evaluation of the results showed a significant difference in aesthetic perception of smile between
the Dentist and general population.
Conclusion: Perception of aesthetics is not similar between the dentists and the general population

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, KuijpersJagtman AM. Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod 2007; 77:759-65.

Coffield KD, Phillips C, Brady M, Roberts MW, Strauss RP, Wright JT. The psychosocial impact of developmental dental defects in people with hereditary amelogenesis imperfecta. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136:620-30.

Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79:399-415.

Shapiro SD, Farrington FH. A potpourri of syndromes with anomalies of dentition. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1983; 19:129-40.

Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers- Jagtman AM. A metaanalysis of the prevalence of

dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32:217-26.

McNeill RW, Joondeph DR. Congenitally absent maxillary lateral incisors: treatment planning considerations. Angle Orthod 1973; 43:24-9.

Tuverson DL. Orthodontic treatment using canines in place of missing maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod 1970; 58:109-27.

Zachrisson BU. Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile: vertical dimension. J Clin Orthod 1998; 35:7432-45.

Jepson NJ, Nohl FS, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Meechan JG, Hosbon RS, et al. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2003; 194: 299-304.

Nunn JH, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hosbon RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, et al. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paediatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2003; 194:245-51.

Kinzer GA, Kokich VO Jr. Managing congenitally missing lateral incisors. Part III: single-tooth implants. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17:202-10.

Miller CJ. The smile line as a guide to anterior esthetics. Dent Clinic North America 1989; 157-64.

Albino JE, Tedesco LA, Conny DJ. Patient perceptions of dental-facial esthetics: Shared concerns in orthodontics and prosthodontics. J Prosth Dent 1984; 52:9-13.

Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists’ and patients’ concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100:345-52.

Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantifi cation: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:116-27.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-28

How to Cite

Zaidi, H. A., Rehman, F. ur ., & Jat, S. A. (2015). Comparison of Aesthetic Perception of Smile Between Dentists and General Population. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences (JDUHS), 9(2), 60–63. Retrieved from https://mail.jduhs.com/index.php/jduhs/article/view/1448

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Hasan Afaq Zaidi, Fazal ur Rehman, Shahbaz Ahmed Jat

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the Journal of Dow University of Health Sciences are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium; provided the original work is properly cited and initial publication in this journal.