This is an outdated version published on 2021-04-06. Read the most recent version.

Clinical Outcome of Fenestration as Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Successes and Obstacles

Authors

  • Aurangzeb Kalhoro Jinnah Medical and Dental College Karachi, Pakistan
  • Abdul Samad Panezai Sandeman Provincial Hospital Quetta, Pakistan
  • Sher Hassan Sandeman Provincial Hospital Quetta, Pakistan
  • Farrukh Javeed Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Lal Rehman Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan

Keywords:

Microdiscectomy, Lumber disc, Herniation., fenestration, visual analogue scale

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical outcome of fenestration as minimally invasive surgery among patients with  lumbar disc herniation undergoing microdiscectomy.
Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Neurosurgery Department of Jinnah
Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi from June 2015 to December 2019. Patients with single-level unilateral side lumbar disc herniation underwent microdiscectomy, age more than 18 years of either gender were consecutively included. The patients were observed for pre and post-surgical pain improvement using a rd visual analogue scale (VAS). The follow-up was conducted at 3 months of treatment.
Results: A total of 247 cases were enrolled. The mean age was 47.57 ±8.22 years. There were 152 (61.5%) males and 95 (38.5%) females. Back pain and radiating leg pain, i.e. 182 (73.7%) and 139 (56.3%) respectively were the most common complaints. Complications were reported in 19 (7.69%) cases. Of these 19 cases, 8 (42.10%) had discitis, 6 (31.57%) had superficial infection, and 5 (26.31%) had dual tear. The VAS score was markedly improved when compared among pre and post-operative cases (7.56 ±1.01 vs. 2.46 ±0.84, p-value <0.001, 95% CI 4.94-5.25).
Conclusion: Our study shows that a microdiscectomy is an effective approach with removal for the unilateral disc with a small incision, early mobilization, low rate to morbidity and success rate based on VAS scoring system was 86.6% ranged from good to excellent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Feng F, Xu Q, Yan F, Xie Y, Deng Z, Hu C, et al. Comparison of 7 Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis. Pain Physician 2017; 20:E863- E71.
2. Huang W, Han Z, Liu J, Yu L, Yu X. Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e2378. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002378.
3. Salzmann SN, Plais N, Shue J, Girardi FP. Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to
widespread adoption. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10:153-9. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9397-4.
4. Junaid M, Rashid MU, Afsheen A, Bukhari SS, Kulsoom A. Analysis of 1058 lumbar prolapsed intervertebral disc
cases in two tertiary care hospitals of pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad2016; 28:281-4.
5. Yadav RI, Long L, Yanming C. Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016627.
6. He J, Xiao S, Wu Z, Yuan Z. Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a
meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2016; 25:1373-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4523-3.
7. Burkhardt BW, Grimm M, Schwerdtfeger K, Oertel JM. The microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation:
a report of 158 patients with a mean follow-up of more than 32 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:1426-34.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003113.
8. Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, Sivasubramanian P, Cahill K, Ziewacz J, et al. Incidence of low back pain after lumbar discectomy for herniated disc and its effect on patient-reported outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473:1988-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1.
9. Chen X, Chamoli U, Lapkin S, Castillo JV, Diwan AD. Complication rates of different discectomy techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a network meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2019; 28:2588-601. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06142-7.
10. Kraemer R, Wild A, Haak H, Herdmann J, Krauspe R, Kraemer J. Classification and management of early
complications in open lumbar microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J 2003; 12:239-46. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0466-y.
11. Bydon M, Macki M, Kerezoudis P, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, et al. The incidence of adjacent segment disease after lumbar discectomy: A study of 751 patients. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 35:42-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.027.
12. Prabhu AV, Lieber BA, Henry JK, Agarwal N, Tabbosha M, Okonkwo DO. Early postoperative complications for
elderly patients undergoing single-level decompression for lumbar disc herniation, ligamentous hypertrophy, or
neuroforaminal stenosis. Neurosurgery 2017; 81:1005- 10. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx224.
13. Heindel P, Tuchman A, Hsieh PC, Pham MH, D'Oro A, Patel NN, et al. Reoperation rates after single-level
lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:E496- E501. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001855.
14. Bydon M, Macki M, Abt NB, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Witham TF, et al. Clinical and surgical outcomes after
lumbar laminectomy: An analysis of 500 patients. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6:S190-3. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.156578.
15. Rasouli MR, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Shokraneh F, MoradiLakeh M, Chou R. Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2014; 9:CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2.
16. Fujimori T, Miwa T, Iwasaki M, Oda T. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fenestration surgery in the Japanese
universal health insurance system. J Orthop Sci 2018; 23:889-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.06.020.
17. Sah RK, Li T, Shi Z, Xie J, Wang Y. Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open
lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A literature review. IJSIT 2019; 097-106.
18. McGrath LB, White-Dzuro GA, Hofstetter CP. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive
or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2019:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689.
19. Kumar M. Raju KP, Shetty S. Outcome analysis of fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc prolapse. Int J
Orthop Sci 2018; 4:373-6. doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i1f.53
20. Rathod J, Tijoriwala P, Khodifad A. A study of results of lumbar fenestration discectomy. Int J Orthop Sci 2019;
5:326-9. doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i3f.1550
21. Khanzada K, Haider A, Aalam M, Khan A, Muner A. Functional outcome of discectomy in single level
lumbar disc disease. Pak J Neuroll Surg 2019; 23:48-51.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-06

Versions

How to Cite

Kalhoro, A., Panezai, A. S., Hassan, S., Javeed, F., & Rehman, L. (2021). Clinical Outcome of Fenestration as Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Successes and Obstacles. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences (JDUHS), 15(1), 23–28. Retrieved from https://mail.jduhs.com/index.php/jduhs/article/view/1016

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)