Establishment of
Infection Prevention and Control Service: A Time for Action
Dr NizamDamani
Senior Consultant, Infection Prevention & Control
World Health Organization and Southern Health and
Social, Care Trust, UK.
Email: nizdamani@aol.com
https://doi.org/10.36570/jduhs.2020.1.933
The
term Healthcare-associated infection is used to
describe infections that are relatedto the delivery of healthcare in any
care setting(e.g. hospitals, long-term
care, and outpatient locations). Some patients who develop infections will have
received care from multiple healthcare facilities (HCFs), in these cases
sometimes it is not always possible to establish with certainty, where the
primarysource of infection occurred by these patients.The term Healthcare-associated
infection replaces both the formerly
used terms ofHospital-acquired
infection and nosocomial
infection.
The real burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is
unknown, this is mostly due to difficulty in gathering reliable surveillance
data. However, it has been estimated that at any time,
over 1.4 million people worldwide are
suffering from infections acquired in various healthcare facilities. HAIs affect all
countries, irrespective of their level of development, and can impact patients,
healthcare workers, families, carers and community at large.
Based on published data, the incidence of HAIs inhigh-income countries occurs insomewhere
between 5% and 10% of all
healthcare interactions. For example,
in the USA it has been estimated that 1.7-2 million patients suffer HAIs
annually resulting in nearly 90,000 deaths each year. 1 The European Centre for Disease Prevention and
Control estimates that, on any given day, about
80,000 patients (1 in 18 patients) have at least one HAI resulting in at least
37,000 deaths per year in European countries. 2
In lowand middle-income
countries, the risk of HAIs is
somewhere between 2-20 times higher, it is estimated that over 25% of healthcare interactions can result in a HAI.
3For babies who
are born in hospital, infections are responsible for between 4%and 56% of all
deaths in the neonatal period while in high-income countries, up to 30% of
patients are affected by at least one HAI while in an intensive care unit.
Establishment
of an effective infection prevention and control (IPC)service
is an integral part ofquality and patient safety programmeswithinevery
healthcare facility.Published data indicates that the provision of good IPC
services helpscontributeto the effective
utilization of beds by reducing the length of hospital stay and post discharge
attendance. It also helps reduce the healthcare cost
associated with treating HAIs whichincludes
enhanced surveillance to detect possible outbreaks, isolation measures,
environmental cleaning as well asinvestigation costs (laboratory and
radiological) related to diagnosing and managing these infections.
4 In addition, it helps prevent the spread of multi-drug
resistant microorganisms, thus reducing both the consumption and cost of use of
broad spectrum antimicrobial agents. This
allows healthcare facilities to integrate IPC as part of an antimicrobial stewardship
programme and help prevent and control spread of antimicrobial
resistance (AMR) microorganisms as outlined in the WHO Global Action Plan. 5One neglected aspect ignored by many healthcare
professionals is that reducing HAIs not only improvespatientsatisfaction,
but also minimizes the financial and psychological impact on individuals and their
families which may result both in morbidity and mortality associated with
avoidable HAIs.
Published literature has clearly identified the major deficiency
in the provision of good IPC practices in Pakistan. 6,7,8The
WHO has published various guidelines which not only outline the core components
to provide effective IPC services, but also develop assessment tools and minimum
requirements for IPC services in all types of healthcare facilities.9,10,
11,12
In view of the current and
previousoutbreaks of HIV infection in Pakistan,8the National
Institute of Health has taken a first step and with the help of the WHO and
local experts developed the first National Guidelines for Infection
Prevention Controlto be published this year. This is commendable as these
guidelines will not only act as a resource for setting up and maintaining an
IPC infrastructure in Pakistan but also provide teaching and training tools. The
guidelines are based on best current scientific evidence and it is hoped that
it will help implement evidence-based IPC practice andprevent unsafe,
ritualisticand wasteful practices4 which are common in all
healthcare facilities. However,
both implementation and sustainability of the standards set out in these
guidelines on a national and local basis would be a challenging task as most
healthcare facilities in Pakistan lack even basic IPC infrastructure.Amongst
others, one of the main reasons for the lack of development of IPC infrastructureis that
neither the policy makers at the national and provincial level nor the senior
managers at local healthcare facility levelare fully convinced that IPC is a
significant element of patient safety. As a result, all the investment in
health sectors aredirected towards providing care for treatment of diseases
rather thanprevention of avoidable HAIs. Due to the lack of IPC infrastructure
there a degree of acceptance exists amongst many healthcare workers that getting
HAI is part of the delivery of healthcareand very little can be done in order
to reduce this.
In the minority of healthcare facilities where IPC infrastructure
exists, HAI reduction is considered the responsibility of the IPC team.A key
reason for this understanding is the lack of a local HAI surveillance programme
to assess the scale of the problem and is compounded by the absence of IPC
training to educate staff that HAI prevention is everyone responsibility.
As a
first step, these challenges can be overcome by establishing effective IPC
programmes at both national and healthcare facility
levels. However, this task will not be easy and will require senior healthcare
policy makersboth at federal and provincial level to undertake significant
strategic planning in the short, medium and long term that is accompanied with
a clear delivery programme.To establish such a programme, technical subject
matter expertise will be required as now IPC is considered a medical speciality
in its own right.Although an IPC role is often undertaken by a Medical
Microbiologist, Infectious Diseases Physician or Public Health Doctors, they
are rarely trained to conduct the full range of duties required of an IPC
Doctor.
Therefore, it is essential that education and training must be
available for clinical staff and a career structure must be established for
both IPC doctors and nurses on a nationwide basis.To achieve this, it may
require technical expertise from countries where the IPC is already fully
established. It is essential all IPC professionalsareproperly qualified and
trained, therefore there is a requirement for a best practiced based local
certification or diploma course to be established which forms part of a
postgraduate qualification complete with a subsequent formal onward career
development pathway.
Fully trained IPC teams
will not only prevent unsafe practices, butwill also focus resources to
implement best evidence based practices and consequently reduce the occurrence
of HAIs. An investment towards building a strong IPC infrastructure is not only
cost effective, but also crucial in improving patient safety andquality of care
for all. Successfulimplementation of an effective IPC programme
requiresadequate resources and engagement and support fromseniorhealthcare managers
(both medical and non-medical).
In conclusion, in view of
global emergence antimicrobial resistant microorganisms and new and emerging
infections, e.g. Ebola, Avian influenza and recent global epidemic of Covid-19
caused by the SARS-2 Corona virus has clearly demonstrated the need to
establish IPC services both at national and healthcare facility level as a
matter of urgency in Pakistan. It is time that a
comprehensive national IPC programme must be established which will also
integrate IPC with an AMR programme. This task will be difficult and require
significant investment, however of utmost importance in view of the ongoing
outbreak in Larkana of HIVand Covid-19 outbreak globally, the time has come for
action.
Received:
March 06, 2020
Accepted: April
14, 2020
REFERENCES
1.
Centre for Diseases control and
prevention. The Direct Medical Costs of
Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of
Prevention. Atlanta: Centre for Diseases control and prevention, 2009.
2.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point
Prevalence Survey of Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use in
European Acute Care Hospitals. Stockholm: European Centre for Disease
Prevention and Control, 2013.
3.
World Health Organization. Report on the Burden of Endemic Health
Care-associated Infection Worldwide. Geneva; World Health Organization, 2011.
4.
Damani N. Manual of
Infection Prevention and Control. Oxford University Press. Oxford, 2019.
5.
World Health Organization. Global
Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Geneva: World Health
Organization,2015.
6.
Mahmood A, RehmanF,Chughtai F.A survey of infection control
practices in the delivery room and nursery to investigate and control the high
rate of neonatal sepsis: An experience at a secondary care hospital. JPak Med Assoc 2008;58: 237-40.
7.
Baqi S, Damani N, Shah SA, Khanani R. Infection control at a
government hospital in Pakistan. Int J
Infect Control 2009; 5: 1-7.
8.
Altaf A, Pasha S, Vermund SH, Shah SA. A second major HIV outbreak
in Larkana, Pakistan. JPak Med Assoc
2016;66:15:10-1
9.
World Health Organization. Guidelines
on core components of infection prevention and control Programmes at the
national and acute healthcare facility level. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 2016.
10.
World Health Organization. IPC Assessment Framework at the Facility Level. Geneva:World
Health Organization,2018.
11.
World Health Organization. Improving
Infection Prevention and Control at the Health Facility. Interim practical
manual supporting implementation of the WHO Guidelines on Core Components of
Infection Prevention and Control Programmes. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 2018.
12. World Health
Organization. Minimum requirements for
infection prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization,
2019.